EDuCATInG The CReATIVE
MaVERICKs |
|
|
|
Empowering Secondary Students in a Literary World
Submitted
by:
Claricia Mohler
Literacy at the secondary level has long been
overlooked, recently however, there have been some concerted efforts
to reverse this trend; Franke (2002) writes 'millions of dollars
fuel early reading research and initiatives in the United States
with the hope of catching students before they fall through these
reading instruction cracks' (p.16). As the nation focuses on
ensuring elementary students meet literacy standards, literacy
skills for secondary students continue to decline. Schools are
charged with the responsibility of fostering reading. Reed (2005)
reports, 'students who are less motivated to read, and who spend
less time practicing their reading skills, typically lag behind
their peers and often experience frustrating academic difficulties.'
The written word in its multi-faceted forms must be read and
understood to ensure a literate community. Every secondary teacher
plays an important role in addressing the literacy needs of all
students and inspiring them to read independently from a variety of
sources.
Students must be given opportunities to develop reading skills in an
array of complex text in an effort to evaluate, synthesize, and
communicate effectively. Once stimulated, educators can motivate the
secondary struggling reader, provide differentiated instruction,
participate in professional development, and provide students a
choice of reading materials to empower them in a literary world.
'The act of learning to read and write has to start from a very
comprehensive understanding of the act of reading the world,
something which human beings do before reading the words' (Freire,
1987). Troubling statistics show that more than three thousand
students drop out of high school every day (Carnegie Corporation,
2004). Moats (2001) says, 'Reading failure begins early, takes root
quickly, and affects students for life,' she goes on to report that
more that '42 percent of 4th graders score below basic in overall
reading skill on the National Assessment of Educational Progress
(NAEP)' (pg. 2) and about 25 percent of the nations adults are
functionally illiterate. The number of high school dropouts is on
the increase and according to Guensburg (2006) more than 8 million
U.S. students in grades 4-12 struggle to read, write, and comprehend
adequately. Thornburgh (2006) from Time magazine states, 'Nearly 1
in 3 public high school students won't graduate' (pg. 32).
Obviously, the need to revisit the secondary reading program is
essential. It is vitally important that the nation's educational
leaders examine and reexamine the task of ensuring students complete
high school. An epidemic is sweeping the educational system not in
the form of an illness but in the form of apathy and indifference.
This problem has either been ignored or passively addressed for far
to long and will escalate if left unchecked. Guensburg (2006) states
that, through The No Child Left Behind Act, President Bush has
directed $25 million in a Striving Readers program to support
reading achievement in poor secondary schools. Children want to
learn to read therefore, teachers must make reading meaningful and
successful through the use of interesting literature. A variety of
reading material must be made available to students so they may
choose what they want to read. Providing students a wide variety of
reading materials will facilitate in keeping them engaged in
literacy.
Literacy for struggling secondary students is obviously a critical
piece of the puzzle in preparing them to graduate from high school
and succeed in post secondary education. Consequently, educators
must learn to identify the characteristics of the struggling
secondary student. Guensburg (2006) quotes Deshler, 'Every teacher,
not just English and language arts instructors, plays a role in
addressing the literacy needs of kids' (pg. 36). This may present a
challenge for subject-area teachers who are accustom to leaving
literacy instruction to English and reading teachers but is of
little consequence when considering the needs of the student. Franke
(2002) says 'many secondary schools are asking their teachers to
learn how to teach reading in addition to the content areas for
which they are responsible.' However, they need to understand and
recognize why students do poorly with reading assignments. Students
may have weak phonological processing abilities thus causing a
deficiency in word recognition speed and accuracy; resulting in
frustration (Moats, 2001). Schools will need to provide training to
equip teachers with the tools necessary to strengthen their lessons
and utilize reading strategies through a variety of materials.
Students who do not like to read will continue to fall behind and
may begin to act out to cover up their reading difficulties. Failing
grades and or not meeting standard on high-stakes testing could be
another indication. Once teachers are able to identify students who
are in need, what becomes the next step in approaching literacy
among secondary students?
The educational community must address different instructional
approaches to providing effective instruction. Some students may
need to build their phonological skills to develop word recognition
and vocabulary, while others may need to strengthen fluency, and yet
others may have to work on deriving meaning from the text by
expanding their vocabularies and using a range of comprehension
strategies (Moats, 2001). Franke (2002) quotes Wren, 'There isn't a
powerful instructional strategy I would use with all students,' but
goes on to say 'It's not the strategy that's important, it's how the
teacher uses it and with which students' (pg. 18). Teachers must
make use of strategies that will reconnect students with reading. It
will be important to provide content that reflects real life
situations and high interest material. Questions teachers ask
students also affect the learning process.
Students avoid questions asked in class for fear of answering
incorrectly, thereby, inhibiting students from learning. Effective
questioning techniques incorporated by the educator will help
increase a student's level of thinking. Blair (2002) discusses
Southwest Educational Development Laboratory (SEDL) program
associate Jill Slack's approach to utilizing questions in the
classroom. Slack categorizes questions into two groups: 'Core
questions - cue and direct the classroom's thought experiences and
focus on observation and recall, comparison, grouping, labeling,
classifying, sequencing, predicting, and inferring' and 'Processing
questions - narrow the focus of discussion, elicit a variety of
responses from different students, provide students with an
opportunity to give evidence for their ideas or information, or help
students create relationships between evidence and statements.' The
responsibility to learn must also fall to the student, for students
must be sharp listeners when using processing questions. Slack goes
on to say Core questions need to be clear, (use language that
students understand) focused, (identify content and thinking skill)
and open (use words that provide students an opportunity to give
complete responses and allow for diverse responses) i.e., 'What did
you notice about the _________?', 'What do you think will happen as
a result of _________?'
On the other hand Slack states Processing questions consist of
questions that may 'refocus,' 'clarify,' 'verify,' 'redirect,'
'narrow the focus,' or 'provide support' depending on the particular
need of the student i.e. a verifying question may be, 'Give me an
example of_______.' or a supporting question may be, 'What is the
reason for thinking will result in _________?' The types of
questions asked, directly affect student's involvement and learning
and prevent students from guessing and having a 50/50 chance of
getting the correct answer with a yes or no response. Philip Gough
(personal communication, March 30, 2006) expressed that in order for
secondary students to become better readers they simply have to read
a lot.
Teachers should constantly promote literacy by modeling, reading to
students, using book talks, and encouraging the use of technology as
tools to learning new information. A literature circle is another
strategy teachers may use in all subject areas to develop literacy.
A literature circle is comprised of a small group of students who
come to a consensus on which book to read. They each have a
particular job that will make them responsible for contributing to
the discussion at the end of the reading. This strategy allows
students to focus on a particular task while still being exposed to
the thoughts and ideas of other students and contribute to the
discussion. Literature circles create a student-centered learning
environment and guide students to understand what they have read,
through dialogue, written and artistic responses. It also allows
them to develop critical thinking skills, which further enhance the
learning process. An abundance of strategies are available to
teachers to engage students in literacy, but these strategies when
ignored or unused simply become missed opportunities.
Professional development in literacy is another essential tool at
the secondary level, as many teachers have specialized areas of
study and may not have the know how to incorporate reading
strategies in their daily lessons. School districts are hiring
reading specialists who will work with teachers to provide
techniques to embed literacy in all subject areas. These reading
specialists provide staff development and conduct classroom visits
to provide teachers with feedback that will help them improve their
approaches to literacy. Support for these programs must begin at the
district level and trickle down to teachers; administrators must
encourage ongoing, job embedded, collaborative work among the staff.
After all, 'Improving literacy is not just an educational or social
need, it is essential if the United States is to compete in the new
global economy' (Davenport and Jones, 2005). Literacy is the
foundation to the world and students in the United States are
guaranteed the right to learn. Educators must be mindful of the gift
of teaching they possess for it is this gift that will empower
students to read. 'Teachers need to constantly, subtly, creatively
invite children into the world of literacy' (Reed, 2005). Perhaps
with a united effort the nation will soon see an increase in
literacy and in the number of students completing high school.
References
Blair, L. (2002). The right questions can
improve student thinking and learning.
SEDL Letter. XIV,
3:20-22.
Carnegie Corporation (2004). A report from
carnegie corporation of new york: Reading next: Vision for action
and research in middle and high school literacy. Washington, DC:
Alliance for Excellent Education.
Davenport, D. &
Jones, J.M. (2005). The politics of literacy. Policy Review.
Retrieved May 6, 2006, from
http://www.policyreview.org/apr05/default.htm.
Frank, J. (2002). Making every teacher reading
teacher: Putnam city secondary educators Work to help struggling
readers.
SEDL Letter. XIV, 3:16-19.
Guensburg,
C. (2006). Why Johnny (still) can't read: As reading skills falter,
educators Push to improve adolescent literacy.
Edutopia.
February 2006, 35-36.
Guensburg, C. (2006). Reading rules: At jeb stuart high, students
can't wait to hit the Books. How'd that happen?
Edutopia.
February 2006, 40-49.
Moats, L.C. (2001). When older
kids can't read. Retrieved April 28, 2006, from
http://www.cedl.org/resource-library/articles/older_read.php?type=recent&id=Yes
Reed, D. (2005). Motivating students to read: Issues
and practices.
SEDL Letter. XVII, 1:14-17.
Rubenstein,
G. (2006). The new drill: On-site coaches focus on teachers, not
students, in battle to boost literacy.
Edutopia. February
2006, 37-39.